- Department: Centre for Women's Studies
- Credit value: 20 credits
- Credit level: M
- Academic year of delivery: 2023-24
- See module specification for other years: 2022-23
Occurrence | Teaching period |
---|---|
A | Semester 2 2023-24 |
This module is primarily designed to familiarise students with a variety of methodologies (ways of assessing and theorising research practices) within women’s studies, while also introducing some key methods (tools for acquiring and analysing data). The module prepares students for their dissertation and helps develop skills for further research. We emphasise: a) interdisciplinarity; b) culturally specific research, and the challenges of working across cultures and languages; c) situating the researching self; d) critical engagement with textual and qualitative methods; e); the identification of research topics and appropriate methodologies for a diverse range of projects.
After successfully completing this course students will be able to:
Identify salient research questions, and applicable methods and theories to respond to these questions
Produce an appropriate ethics form, and critically reflect on ethical considerations in research
Demonstrate reflexivity in their learning process
Plan in outline an M-level research project
Deal with primary and secondary material across a range of academic and popular sources, critically assessing their strengths and limitations in investigating gender issues
Utilise traditional and digital methods of information retrieval and bibliographic resources for research purposes
Discuss and engage with mono- multi- trans- and inter- disciplinary research methods and methodologies within feminist research
Demonstrate an understanding of cultural and historical specificity.
Task | % of module mark |
---|---|
Essay/coursework | 100 |
None
For GEMMA Yr 1 students, the assessment format of the essay/portfolio will remain the same total length (3,500-4,000 words) but the requirements will be slightly adjusted, whereby the portfolio will consist of: reflexive journal 2,000-2,500 words; a literature review 1,500-2,000 words (total 3,500-4,000). The portfolio will constitute 100% of the module mark. The research poster (previously worth 10% of total module mark) will be removed as a summative requirement and turned into a formative exercise instead, for this cohort as well as all students taking Feminist Research Methodologies. All students will receive support on designing their research poster in a FRACS skills workshop at the start of sem 2, and all students will present their posters at the annual Sisterhood in Action conference, which should enable students to discuss their research with a wider group and use the formative research poster as both a networking and project/research-development opportunity. This will ensure tailored support for GEMMA Yr 1 students and equity of assessment support provided.
Task | % of module mark |
---|---|
Essay/coursework | 100 |
Students will receive written feedback on their summative assessment, as per the standard university assessment policies and practices. They will also receive continuous formative feedback and support via the module workshops, staff office hours, and the annual Sisterhood in Action conference, where students will present their formative research posters and further hone their assessment topics and dissertation research and methodological ideas.
Anzaldúa, G. Borderlands/ La Frontera: the new mestiza Spinsters/Aunt Lute, 1987.
Buikema, R. et al. Theories and methodologies in postgraduate feminist research: researching differently
Routledge, 2011.
Johnson, R, et.al. The practice of cultural studies, Sage, 2004.
Letherby G. ‘Gender-Sensitive Method/ologies' in Richardson, D.; & Robinson, V.; Introducing
gender and women’s studies Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
Mounzar, L. War in Translation: Giving voice to the women of Syria The Literary Hub, 2016.
Parameswaran, R. ‘Media Ethnography in India: Exploring Power, Gender, and Culture in the Field’
Qualitative Enquiry, 7:1, 2001.
Ramazanoglu, C.; Feminist methodology: challenges and choices, Sage, 2002.