- Department: School of Social and Political Sciences
- Credit value: 30 credits
- Credit level: I
- Academic year of delivery: 2022-23
Capitalism takes many forms, but in each variety, there is ongoing debate about the proper role of the state versus the market. This debate often gets reduced to crude assumptions: markets are efficient, governments are inefficient; citizens need the (welfare) state, private businesses need to be left alone. The reality is more complex than this. Different forms of capitalism satisfy and balance the needs of citizens in different ways and to different extents. This module asks “which variety of capitalism does best in meeting the public good?”.
Occurrence | Teaching period |
---|---|
A | Autumn Term 2022-23 to Summer Term 2022-23 |
In this interdisciplinary module, students will draw on the broad on politics, sociology and social policy to acquire knowledge and understanding about different forms of capitalism and the way in which the needs and interests of different groups are met (or left unmet). In term one we will explore, theoretically and empirically, the impact of work, welfare, production and consumption on people and the economy. In Term Two students will investigate, in an extended essay, one or more themes or issues raised in Term One. They will propose an area for further study and will carry out an independent study of this area under the guidance of an allocated supervisor.
The aims of this module are to:
At the end of this module students will be able to:
Utilise appropriately key concepts and tools of analysis to aid understanding of the business-society nexus, including but not limited to: power; alienation; exploitation; efficiency; commodification and decommodification; production regime.
Critically reflect on what contemporary capitalism is, how it operates, and alternative methods of organising the economy
Understand the ways in which social, political, economic and institutional interests shape the conceptualisation of human and business needs
Critical awareness of how corporate behaviour impacts on citizens as workers and consumers, as well as on local communities, public services and political institutions
Understand and critically analyse the role and function of the welfare state for different parts of society and the economy
Work independently to investigate, analyse and articulate solutions to social problems
Communicate knowledge and ideas effectively using a range of written presentation techniques
Indicative Content
Semester 1: Theories and Issues (delivered through weekly lectures/seminars)
What is capitalism?
Varieties of capitalism
What is meant by ‘public good’?
Whose benefit? Social and corporate welfare.
The needs of citizens versus the needs of capital
Welfare in work and welfare to work
Anti-social policy
Investors or predators? TNCs and footloose capital
Big business and poor peoples: looking at the Global South
Giving and taking: corporate social responsibility, philanthropy and taxation
Have we reached peak capitalism?
Semester 2: Extended essay
Topic is introduced and discussed over first 3 weeks (1 hour lectures and seminars).
Following the introductory lecture, students will undertake an extended essay in a topic of their choice. One-to-one supervision of 3 hours will be provided.
Task | % of module mark |
---|---|
Coursework - extensions not feasible/practicable | 40 |
Essay/coursework | 60 |
None
Formative work is embedded in the small group teaching where students actively discuss and reflect on their completed summaries, giving and receiving peer and tutor feedback.
The Term 1 Portfolio is made up of short summaries/reflections based on allocated readings (assigned each week). This is worth 40% of the final mark.
The summaries will be submitted and assessed throughout the term in order to provide regular and useful summative feedback. Students will be asked to submit up to 9 summaries in total per term. They must submit a minimum of 5.
The overall mark for the portfolio will be calculated as an average of the highest five marks. Non-submissions will be awarded a mark of zero.
Because the summaries will inform the discussion in the seminars, and because feedback from that week's summary will be provided by the tutor, all summaries have to be completed in advance of the relevant seminar. To ensure equity and to prevent unfair advantage to any students, extensions to deadlines thus cannot be granted. However, there will be five recovery opportunities built into the assessment to enable students to achieve the required minimum number of submissions.
Students who fail to achieve a passing mark for the module as a whole would have to complete an alternative assessed piece of work (a replacement essay as set out below). In all instances, students are able to apply to the relevant Departmental ECC if their circumstances warrant it.
The Extended Essay will be based on a topic that will be agreed with the allocated supervisor. Regular informal feedback will be offered on the project, method of enquiry, and writing. Supervisors will be able to comment on short drafts, up to 1/5th of the esay (1000 words).
Task | % of module mark |
---|---|
Coursework - extensions not feasible/practicable | 40 |
Essay/coursework | 60 |
Feedback will be provided on summaries via Turnitin Grademark.
For other components, feedback will be provided to students using a standard marking and feedback matrix.
All work will be returned within the University Turnaround Time policy (although feedback on the summaries will usually be speedier in order to increase learning opportunities, especially in term 1).
Generic feedback is also provided in the weekly classes. Students are also given the opportunity to discuss assessment performance through arrangements for academic supervision.
Farnsworth, K. (2012). Social versus Corporate Welfare: Competing Needs and Interests within the Welfare State. London, Palgrave.
Fooks G, G. A., Collin J, Holden C, Lee K. (2013). "The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR." Journal of Business Ethics Jan(112(2)): 283-299.
Gough, I. (2000). Global Capital, Human Needs and Social Policies. Basingstoke, Palgrave.
Streeck, W. (2017). How Will Capitalism End? London, Verso.
Hall, P. A. and D. Soskice, Eds. (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Hills, J. 2014. Good Times, Bad Times: The Welfare Myth of Them and Us. Bristol: Policy Press
Madely, J. (2006). Big Business, Poor Peoples: The Impact of Transnational Corporations on the World's Poor. Second Edition. London, Zed Books.
Squires, P. (1990). Anti-Social Policy. Welfare, Ideology and the Disciplinary State. London, Harvester Wheatsheaf.