- Department: Philosophy
- Credit value: 20 credits
- Credit level: M
- Academic year of delivery: 2023-24
- See module specification for other years: 2024-25
Students on this module will work in groups of up to 8. They will form a Data Governance Committee, setting their own Terms of Reference and working practices. They will then be given 2 cases to decide upon as a Committee. Teamwork will be assessed by the minutes of the Committee. Students will also write an individual report on each case study.
Occurrence | Teaching period |
---|---|
A | Semester 1 2023-24 |
By working collaboratively as a formally constituted governance committee, you will learn to learn to research, evaluate and make recommendations about real cases of data privacy in a way that this would be handled in a working environment.
Case studies are chosen which will require you to understand ethical, political, regulatory and technical issues of data privacy. You will need to be aware of your own strengths and weaknesses in these different areas and how to work as an effective team with people who have different strengths.
By the end of this module students should be able to …
Work in a team drawing upon other team members’ skills and knowledge to produce a collective decision
Meet the professional standards of formal governance committees
Demonstrate an appreciation of, and a sensitivity to, the complexity of real world examples of data privacy
Research the technical, regulatory, ethical, social and political context of real world data privacy issues
Come to a considered and practical recommendation in the light of all available information
Students will form Ethics & Governance Committees (up to 8 per Committee). At the start of term the Committee must elect a Chair and Vice-Chair and write its own Terms of Reference (examples will be given), including term of office for Chair. Each Committee will be assigned an academic tutor to act as professional advisor and a staff member as secretary for taking minutes (the approved minutes will form part of the assessment). ToR may be reviewed mid-term.
The Committee will be set two ‘cases’ (real case studies) over the term. They will have to decide what reports they need, who produces those and what process to follow. They can determine their own pattern of meetings, so long as a decision on each case is reached by the end of the term.
An example case for might be:
Write a report for UKHSA with recommendations on how to manage data privacy in a contact tracing mobile phone app in a future pandemic.
You must consider the strengths and weaknesses of apps used during the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK and in one country from Europe, one from Asia, and one from Australasia.
Your assumptions will be that a new pandemic is likely within the next 5 years so any app must use existing technology, and that contact tracing of infected people will be essential to the public health strategy.
Assessment will consist of the minutes of the meetings (group assessment) and an individual report (2000 words) on each case.
Task | % of module mark |
---|---|
Essay/coursework | 30 |
Essay/coursework | 30 |
Groupwork | 20 |
Groupwork | 20 |
Other
Task | % of module mark |
---|---|
Essay/coursework | 30 |
Essay/coursework | 30 |
Oral presentation/seminar/exam | 40 |
Tutors observing meetings will give formative feedback at the end of each meeting orally.
Written group feedback will be provided at the end of each case study (Weeks 6 and 11). Individual feedback will be provided with the release of summative marks.
Carissa Veliz, Privacy is Power (Penguin, 2020)
Kyle Taylor, The Little Black Book of Data and Democracy, (Byline, 2021)
Edward Snowden, Permanent Record, (Macmillan, 2019)
Students may also enjoy watching the following documentary:
Coded Bias (2020) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11394170/