- Department: Philosophy
- Credit value: 20 credits
- Credit level: M
- Academic year of delivery: 2024-25
- See module specification for other years: 2023-24
In this module we will consider the attractions and fallbacks of adopting fictionalist attitudes to a range of domains of discourse. Fictionalists about a discourse typically hold that there is some advantage to be gained to participating in that discourse, but also hold that we have no reason to believe that claims uttered in the context of engaging with the discourse are true. A paradigm case is fiction itself: what we gain in enjoyment from telling and listening to fictional tales does not depend on those tales being true. But fictionalism has been advocated about a range of other domains too: mathematics, modality, morality, religion, scientific models, and more. We will consider arguments for various forms of fictionalism, as well as the question of whether fictionalisms of any sort can succeed in their typical aims of helping us to avoid unwanted ontological commitments.
Occurrence | Teaching period |
---|---|
A | Semester 1 2024-25 |
Subject content
To consider the prospects for fictionalism as a strategy for avoiding problematic ontological commitments.
To examine some specific forms of contemporary fictionalism, including at least mathematical, modal, moral and religious fictionalism, including challenges to these views.
To reflect on metaontological questions concerning how we should go about answering
Academic and graduate skills
To develop students’ interpretative skills, by careful study and discussion of contemporary philosophical research..
To develop students’ writing skills, by writing an essay on fictionalism
To develop students’ analytical skills, by encouraging them to consider arguments for forms of fictionalism as present in the contemporary literature, and to defend or challenge these arguments.
By the end of this module, students should be able to:
Explain and evaluate various forms of fictionalism.
Articulate and contribute to recent debates over particular forms of fictionalism.
Critically evaluate fictionalist attempts to preserve our ability to engage in discourse without incurring problematic ontological commitments.
Task | % of module mark |
---|---|
Essay/coursework | 100 |
None
Task | % of module mark |
---|---|
Essay/coursework | 100 |
Feedback will be given in accordance with the policies of the University and Philosophy Department
Frederick Kroon, Stuart Brock, and Jonathan McKeown-Green, A Critical Introduction to Fictionalism (Bloomsbury, 2019)
Bradley Armour-Garb and Frederick Kroon, Fictionalism in Philosophy (OUP, 2020)
Mark Eli Kalderon, Fictionalism in Metaphysics (OUP, 2005)