This module introduces students to the moral, legal, and political philosophy of early post- Kantian philosophers such as Erhard, Fichte, Maimon, Rehberg, and Schmalz.
Module will run
Occurrence
Teaching period
A
Semester 2 2024-25
Module aims
This module aims to:
(i) provide an introduction to the moral, legal, and political philosophy (the “practical philosophy”) of early post-Kantian philosophers such as Erhard, Fichte, Maimon, Rehberg, and Schmalz.
(ii) consider how the practical philosophy of the early post-Kantians might illuminate central issues and debates in practical philosophy.
(iii) enable students to develop their skills in critical analysis, argument, and communication.
Module learning outcomes
By the end of this module, students should have an in-depth and systematic understanding of some key debates, positions, and arguments in early post-Kantian moral, legal, and political philosophy.
They should also be able to:
analyse complex theories and arguments, displaying critical awareness
synthesize information and ideas from a variety of sources at the forefront of the discipline
evaluate research critically
show originality in the discussion and evaluation of ideas from the philosophical literature in developing their own arguments
Students should show the ability to work autonomously and self-critically on an extended essay that goes beyond the core framework that is provided in teaching sessions.
Module content
The early post-Kantians (philosophers such as Erhard, Fichte, Maimon, Rehberg, and Schmalz) applied the insights and methods of Kant’s “Critical Philosophy” to central issues in moral, legal, and political philosophy. In so doing, they developed positions and arguments that are striking for their originality and philosophical significance. In this module, we explore the practical philosophy of the early post-Kantians by engaging critically with recent translations (some of which have yet to be published) and cutting-edge scholarship.
Topics considered will include some or all of the following:
The nature of human rights and arguments for their existence.
The legitimacy of revolution and the morality of revolutionary action.
Ideology and ideology critique.
The relationship between law and morality.
The relationship between theory and practice.
Indicative assessment
Task
% of module mark
Essay/coursework
100
Special assessment rules
None
Indicative reassessment
Task
% of module mark
Essay/coursework
100
Module feedback
Feedback will be returned in line with the current University and Departmental guidelines.
Indicative reading
Beiser, F. C. Enlightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism: The Genesis of Modern German Political Thought, 1790-1800 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press).
Clarke, J. A. and Gottlieb, G. (eds.) Practical Philosophy from Kant to Hegel: Freedom, Right, and Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).
Erhard, J. B. “Devil’s Apology”, trans. J. A. Clarke and C. Rhode, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 27 (1):194-215.
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, Contribution to the Correction of the Public’s Judgments on the French Revolution, trans. J. Church and A. M. Schön (New York: SUNY Press, 2021).
Maimon, S. “On the First Grounds of Natural Right”, trans. M. Nance and J. Yonover, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 29 (1):157-172.
Rehberg, A.W. “On the Relationship between Theory and Practice”, trans. M. L. Gregory, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 29 (6):1166-1176.
Schmalz, T. A. H. “The Pure Natural Right”, trans. J. Church and A. M. Schön, British Journal for the History of Philosophy (currently only available in e-format).