- Department: Music
- Credit value: 20 credits
- Credit level: M
- Academic year of delivery: 2023-24
- See module specification for other years: 2024-25
Recent empirical studies revealed a harsh level of social discrimination in the recording studio. Also, the strongly unbalanced gender and racial demographics of the audio workforce directly impact quality standards and aesthetic canons, thus gatekeeping the diversity of technologies, techniques, and creative processes that get legitimised in music production. This module requires you to reflect upon the problematic aspects of the cultures and traditions of the discipline by discussing and proposing alternatives to the dominant modernity narrative.
Occurrence | Teaching period |
---|---|
A | Semester 1 2023-24 |
In this module, you will engage with feminist and post-colonial theories published in a range of related fields (e.g. Computer Sciences, Ethnomusicology, Music Education, Music Theory, Science and Technology Studies, and Sound Studies). You will be encouraged to confront these theories with your past studio experiences and current aspirations to find your own voice in music production. Also, methods to apply mediation theories and critical listening approaches to analyse commercial productions will complement the process of deconstructing music studio meritocracy myths.
Seminars will focus on topics including (among others) gendered notions of recording fidelity; deep listening practices; sonic fictions, afrofuturism, alternative modernities, and DIY approaches of music production; and accessibility of audio education, high tech, studio and performance spaces. In parallel, critical listening sessions and track analysis presentations will enable you to draw interconnections between sonic aesthetics, production personnel, scenes, and cultures. Assessment will consist of an essay on an album, producer, production collective, label, studio, and/or movement with critical thinking based on the module content.
By the end of the module you should be able to:
analyse existing music productions within their sociocultural context and impact, beyond a description of production techniques and technologies
select appropriate academic references, critically evaluate and cite them in presentation and essay
identify social biases and absences in the relevant literature and recording industry
contribute to the dialogue around transforming and diversifying music production narratives
defend your own production approaches, with awareness of gatekeeping mechanisms
Task | % of module mark |
---|---|
Essay/coursework | 100 |
None
Students will submit an essay that will focus on the aesthetics, socialities, creative processes, and production context and impact of an album, producer, production collective, label, studio or movement, with links to the module content and references (c. 3000 words)
Task | % of module mark |
---|---|
Essay/coursework | 100 |
You will receive written feedback in line with standard University turnaround times.
Cox, Christopher, & Warner, D. (Eds.). (2017). Audio Culture Readings in Modern Music
Bates, E. (2016). Digital Tradition: Arrangement and Labor in Istanbul's Recording Studio Culture. Oxford University Press.
Eshun, K. (1998). More brilliant than the sun : adventures in sonic fiction / concept engineered by Kodwo Eshun. London: Quartet Books.
Gaston-Bird, L. (2019). Women in Audio. Focal Press.
Reddington, H. (2021). She’s at the Controls: Sound Engineering, Production and Gender Ventriloquism in the 21st Century. Equinox.
Weheliye, A. G. (2005). Phonographies : grooves in sonic Afro-modernity. Duke University Press.
Zagorski-Thomas, S. (2014). The musicology of record production. Cambridge University Press.
Background reading:
Albertine, V. (2014). Clothes, Clothes, Clothes. Music, Music, Music. Boys, Boys, Boys.: A Memoir. Macmillan.
Tutti, C. F. (2017). Art Sex Music. Faber & Faber.
Womack, Y. (2013). Afrofuturism : the world of black sci-fi and fantasy culture / Ytasha L. Womack. (First edition.). Chicago : Chicago Review Press.