Blending modes of study

Decisions on how in-person and online teaching will be balanced are likely to be constrained by departmental and institutional decisions (for example space allocation on campus). 

For module leaders making decisions on how best to use your allocation and blend learning a recommended approach is to:

  • identify how your students can be supported in achieving optimal approaches to learning to achieve the outcomes
  • reflect on the benefits and constraints of each learning mode in encouraging these approaches
  • sequence your module so that the learning options complement each other and mitigate risks.

The main benefits and constraints of in-person and online learning are oriented around:

  • Student approaches to learning, and whether these are effective in terms of meeting the module outcomes
  • Student engagement: attendance, engagement with task or discussion
  • Accessibility and Inclusion: flexibility and support to ensure the needs of all students are addressed
  • Affective qualities: social and physical presence, interaction, community, relationship building.

The considerations below can underpin decisions on how best to combine student work and staff-student contact in your design by mixing the following different modes of learning to best effect:

  • Synchronous learning in-person (eg on-campus lectures, workshops, seminars)
  • Synchronous learning online (eg webinars, online supervision meetings or drop-ins)
  • Asynchronous learning online (eg guided, active learning supported online and involving student interaction with peers/staff/content)
  • Independent study (work that students undertake independently outside of contact time that is likely to be less guided by online support).

Mapping goals to modes of study

Bearing in mind the issues considered above, it is worth mapping the goals of different activities to the mode that will best fit their achievement (individual and group; in-person, online synchronous or asynchronous).

This will guide you to the mix of asynchronous and synchronous activities that will lend itself best to different elements of the module, eg:

  • Guided asynchronous reading → Live discussion → Summary of group discussion
  • Live preparation for group work (team name / role allocation / work plan) → Asynchronous group work using shared communication channel or wiki → Live update meeting to review progress and decide on next steps → Complete group work and share ‘product’ with cohort
  • Live lecture introduces an experiment with the underpinning theories → Quiz to check understanding of key concepts and plan to carry out lab work → Lab work → Complete lab book and reflection based on a specific reflective model → Asynchronous comparison with tutor feedback to the whole group