Accessibility statement

Co-construction, student partners and student voice

Across all aspects of learning and teaching practice, co-construction, student voice and partnership working between staff and students is central to achieving meaningful and impactful change. Students are at the heart of the academic community and can best provide an insight into how learning and teaching practices work for and affect their study, achievement and sense of belonging.

You may also want to check out our reflective questions on co-construction, student partners and student voice. These reflective questions have been produced by Inclusive-Learning@York, working closely with student interns, to support University of York staff to explore, discuss and reflect on inclusive practices in their teaching, learning and assessment.

Practical guidance

Across all aspects of learning and teaching practice, co-construction, student voice and partnership working between staff and students is central to achieving meaningful and impactful change. Students are at the heart of the academic community and can best provide an insight into how learning and teaching practices work for and affect their study, achievement and sense of belonging. 

Co-construction and students as partners: staff and students working collaboratively together as partners in the development of all areas of learning and teaching. This includes embedding co-construction into both curriculum design and pedagogical approaches - key areas to consider developing co-construction with students include programme design, module design, learning and teaching approaches and assessments.

Student voice: Student voice refers to opportunities for students to share their perspectives and feedback on their learning and teaching experiences, and for this feedback to be listened to and valued.

  • Consider where you might work with students as collaborators and partners in curriculum design, creating the opportunity to develop an inclusive curriculum that is relevant to all students, recognising and valuing their lived experiences, prior learning and diverse perspectives. See further our guidance on inclusive curriculum design.

  • Consider where you might work with students as collaborators and partners in developing pedagogical approaches, creating the opportunity to develop inclusive learning communities which enable the full participation and engagement of all students and ensure that the diverse learning needs and preferences of all students are met.

  • Co-construction offers the opportunity to transform learning through enabling the engagement of diverse communities of students, including those who may traditionally be marginalised in higher education. It is important to ensure student partnership opportunities are reflective of a diverse student body. Consider how to ensure a wide range of students have the opportunity to work as collaborators and partners, and how to ensure recruitment processes are inclusive and open to a wide range of students.

  • Consider ways in which students can be supported and rewarded when working in partnership and co-construction. For example, paying students for their work can ensure a more diverse body of students are enabled/encouraged to apply for the role, and also recognises the value of the work being carried out by the student.

  • By considering what power dynamics or hierarchies may be present in student partnership or co-construction work that you are involved with, there is the opportunity to increase engagement and ensure the outcome and knowledge produced is equally reflective of all parties involved. It can be helpful to create space for conversations about this within partnerships, challenge what knowledge is valued and why, define roles and responsibilities within the partnership collaboratively.

  • Consider the barriers certain student groups may face when entering into a student-staff partnership and how you might overcome these. Consider the different needs and experiences some students may have, and how this affects their engagement within partnerships.

  • Consider any institutional barriers which may affect the success of a meaningful partnership or student voice project. This may include things like resource and funding, policy, time commitments and potential tensions between personal and institutional values. Be open and reflective about these barriers within your partnership.

  • Consider what mechanisms are in place to navigate conflict within partnership spaces. Think about whose responsibility it may be to resolve these conflicts, or whether alternatively it is okay to have disagreement within partnerships. Discuss this collaboratively.

  • Meaningful student partnerships should respect and value different ways of working. It is important to be open-minded and create partnership spaces which are dynamic with space to reflect upon any key assumptions and values - consider what steps you might take to create this.

  • Consider what opportunities are currently incorporated into your learning and teaching practice for meaningful student feedback. Feedback opportunities should allow for a holistic reflection of students’ experiences of curriculum, pedagogy and wider learning experiences.

  • Ensure you maintain space and time to reflect on student feedback collected about your learning and teaching spaces, and consider this and reflectively. Consider how you might act upon student feedback within future learning and teaching activities. Consider the importance of sharing feedback within the academic community, and discussing student voice openly both with students themselves and colleagues.

Case studies of good practice

These case studies of good practice reflect several pieces of work taking place across the University which promote and teach important lessons about inclusive teaching and learning practice.

Show all / Hide all

Additional resources