Counterterrorism policies of Pakistan; How does a war generation survive and resist the armed conflict in the Tribal districts?
Terrorism studies have often focused on terrorism as the only problem and state responses as the solution but sometimes state counterterrorism measures can contribute to the problem. Critical Terrorism Studies (CTS) have shown that violent counterterrorism measures are often ineffective, and counterproductive and exacerbate the suffering of Indigenous Local Communities. In particular, from a postcolonial perspective, we can see how these measures can end up reproducing imperial power relations. For example, the FATA region (now Tribal districts) in Pakistan has been created as a buffer zone for centuries and communities there are still marginalised. Yet, local communities are not just passive victims of non-state terrorism or state counterterrorism violence. We know that they also have rich arsenals of resistance in everyday ways, for example, the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement. Existing research in orthodox, as well as CTS, often focuses on policies in Western countries and there has been very little research on local communities not just as victims but as political actors. Building on postcolonial approaches and CTS the project focuses on the notion of how civilians survive and resist armed conflict – terrorism and counterterrorism – in Pakistan, which not only contributes to academic research but also has policy implications.
International Master in Security Intelligence and Strategic Studies (IMSISS), University of Glasgow, UK, Dublin City University, Ireland, and Charles University, Czech Republic.
BS (Hon) in Political Science, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Conference papers
Op-ed
Visiting Lecturer, Government AKL Postgraduate College, Matta Swat, Pakistan
Subject taught
Visiting Lecturer (distance learning program), University of Peshawar, Pakistan.
Subject taught