Visit Dr Thalia Gerzso's profile on the York Research Database to:
- See a full list of publications
- Browse activities and projects
- Explore connections, collaborators, related work and more
Thalia Gerzso joined the Department of Politics and International Relations in 2024. Her research primarily focuses on political institutions (with a focus on judiciary, legislature, and legal systems) and African politics. More specifically, Thalia’s research investigates how political actors can manipulate the legal and constitutional framework to achieve their preferred political outcome. Her research appears in Comparative Political Studies, Comparative Politics, and Electoral Studies and has been supported by the United States Institute of Peace and the American Political Science Association, among others. Her article on judicial resistance also received the Alexander L. George Best Article Award from the American Political Science Association.
Prior to joining the Department of Politics and International Relations, Thalia held a postdoctoral fellowship at the London School of Economics. Thalia holds a Ph.D. in political science from Cornell University, an LL.M from Cornell Law School and a Master in international law from Université Paris 2 Panthéon Assas. Admitted to the New York Bar, Thalia worked as a lawyer and human rights advocate prior to starting her career in academia.
Personal website: www.thaliagerzso.com
Thalia Gerzso’s research agenda seeks to understand formal institutions' role in democratic processes. More specifically, her research agenda aims to
Thalia has a regional focus on Africa and relies on a wide array of methodological tools, such as quantitative analysis of micro-level data, process tracing, and comparative historical analysis. Thalia currently has two major streams of research that explore these questions. First, she examines how judicial institutions can facilitate—or hinder—democratic processes. The second stream of research seeks to identify the lawfare strategies incumbents weaponize to remain in power and why they prioritise specific sets of institutions.