Home
News and events
News
2023 news
Research
Left-handers aren’t better spatially, gaming research shows

Left-handers aren’t better spatially, gaming research shows

Posted on 9 November 2023

Leonardo Da Vinci was one, so too Albert Einstein and Joan of Arc, while the footballer Diego Maradona was famous for using his against England, we are of course talking about left-handers.

It’s been debated for decades, but now researchers at the University of York and University College London have suggested that left-handedness is not linked to better spatial skills.

By asking participants to download and play a video game that captured user information and tracked navigational challenges, researchers were able to measure demographic data – including hand preference – and activity from more than 420,000 international participants, across 41 different countries. They found that left handers were neither better nor worse than right handers at the tasks, clarifying a long-running debate about the links between handedness and spatial skills.

Brain hemispheres

The brain has two hemispheres, controlling the opposite sides of the body; so in right handers, the left hemisphere controls the dominant right hand, whereas the situation is reversed in left-handers. Many cognitive abilities are also dominated by one of the two brain hemispheres, while right and left handers also show different patterns of lateralisation – the specialisation of a particular area. As a result, many debates about cognitive differences related to handedness are also debates about the effects of brain lateralisation on cognitive abilities.

Spatial cognition, the ability of humans to perceive and navigate our physical environment, is a fundamental set of brain-based skills. It is also not clearly dominated by either hemisphere, leaving scientists unclear as to whether it has any link to handedness.

Challenges

Some, inconclusive, research has suggested that left-handers might be better at navigating virtual and real games and left-handed athletes are known to be over-represented in the in professional sports requiring rapid and accurate responses. However, it’s been a tricky issue to research, partly because handedness prevalence changes from culture to culture, and partly because testing for handedness effects requires a large number of participants. Using the video game Sea Hero Quest, the researchers were able to overcome both challenges.

Dr Pablo Fernandez-Velasco, a researcher at the Department of Philosophy at the University of York, who co-led the study, said: “Recruiting participants in our study through a video game is a new approach, which allowed us to standardise a test across a very large sample. We found no reliable evidence for any difference in spatial ability between left and right handers, across all countries. Moreover, that large data sample allowed us to confirm that factors like age, gender and education don’t play a part in the relationship between hand preference and spatial ability.”

Navigate

The users in the study downloaded and played Sea Hero Quest, a free app that measures spatial navigational ability and was originally designed to contribute to research on dementia.

It asks participants to view a map featuring both their current position and their goal locations, and they are then asked to navigate a boat as quickly as possible towards goal locations in a specified order. Only participants reaching level 11 of the game were included. Informed in-app consent was obtained from all participants.

Cognition

Left handers in the sample made up an average of 9.94% of the participants, with more males using their left hand compared with women, similar to what had previously been found in the general population.

Dr Fernandez-Velasco adds: “We’re still finding out so much about cognition, and although we’ve shown that large-scale spatial skills aren’t affected by left and right handedness, perhaps further research will find some differences based on handedness when it comes to navigation styles, or to preferences for different types of environments”