Systematic reviews are a good source of independent evidence to inform healthcare decision-making.

A systematic review attempts to identify, appraise and synthesize all the empirical evidence that meets pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a specific research question. Researchers conducting systematic reviews use explicit, systematic methods that are selected to minimise bias to produce more reliable findings to inform decision-making.

Here are examples of evidence syntheses on Behavioural Activation involving staff from the University of York, TEWV NHS Trust and other NHS and charitable partners of the University of York.

Contact us

imry@york.ac.uk

Contact us

imry@york.ac.uk