% LaTeX source for Table I from Galton on Regression (set landscape)

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{times}

\newcommand{\z}{\phantom{0}}

\begin{document}

\begin{center}

\begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
\multicolumn{18}{c}{\large TABLE I.} \\
\multicolumn{18}{c}{\ } \\
\multicolumn{18}{c}{\textsc{Number of Adult Children of various statures 
                            born of 205 Mid-parents of various statures.}} \\
\multicolumn{18}{c}{(All female heights have been multiplied by 1.08).} \\
\hline
Heights of & \multicolumn{14}{|c|}{Heights of the Adult Children.} 
           & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{Total number of} & \\
the Mid- & \multicolumn{14}{|c|}{\ } & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\ } & Medians. \\
\cline{2-17}
parents in & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & \\
inches. & & & & & & & & & & & & & & & Adult & Mid- & \\
& Below   &62.2&63.2&64.2&65.2&66.2&67.2&68.2&69.2&70.2&71.2&72.2&73.2&Above
        & Children. & parents. & \\
\hline
Above   & ..& ..& .. & .. & .. & ..& ..  & .. & .. & .. & .. & \z1& \z3& ..
        & \z\z4 & \z\z5 & .. \\
72.5    & ..& ..& .. & .. & .. & ..& ..  & \z1& \z2& \z1& \z2& \z7& \z2& \z4
        & \z19  & \z6 & 72.2 \\
71.5    & ..& ..& .. & .. & \z1& \z3& \z4& \z3& \z5& 10 & \z4& \z9& \z2& \z2
        & \z43  & \z11 & 69.9 \\
70.5    & 1 & ..& \z1& .. & \z1& \z1& \z3& 12 & 18 & 14 & \z7& \z4& \z3& \z3
        & \z68  & \z22 & 69.5 \\
69.5    & ..& ..& \z1& 16 & \z4& 17 & 27 & 20 & 33 & 25 & 20 & 11 & \z4& \z5
        & 183   & \z41 & 68.9 \\
68.5    & 1 & ..& \z7& 11 & 16 & 25 & 31 & 34 & 48 & 21 & 18 & \z4& \z3& ..
        & 219   & \z49 & 68.2 \\
67.5    & ..& 3 & \z5& 14 & 15 & 36 & 38 & 28 & 38 & 19 & 11 & \z4& .. & ..
        & 211   & \z33 & 67.6 \\
66.5    & ..& 3 & \z3& \z5& \z2& 17 & 17 & 14 & 13 & \z4& .. & .. & .. & ..
        & \z78  & \z20 & 67.2 \\
65.5    & 1 & ..& \z9& \z5& \z7& 11 & 11 & \z7& \z7& \z5& \z2& \z1& .. & ..
        & \z66  & \z12 & 66.7 \\
64.5    & 1 & 1 & \z4& \z4& \z1& \z5& \z5& .. & \z2& .. & .. & .. & .. & ..
        & \z23  & \z\z5 & 65.8 \\
Below   & 1 & ..& \z2& \z4& \z1& \z2& \z2& \z1& \z1& .. & .. & .. & .. & ..
        & \z14  & \z\z1 & .. \\
\hline 
Totals  & 5 & 7 & 32 & 59 & 48 & 117& 138& 120& 167& 99 & 64 & 41 & 17 & 14
        & 928 & 205 & .. \\
\hline
Medians & ..& ..&66.3&67.8&67.9&67.7&67.9&68.3&68.5&69.0&69.0&70.0& .. & ..
        & ..  & ..  & .. \\
\hline 
\multicolumn{18}{c}{\ } \\
\multicolumn{18}{l}{\textsc{Note}---In calculating the Medians, the entries 
have been taken as referring to the middle of the squares in which they stand.  
The reason why the} \\
\multicolumn{18}{l}{headings run 62.2, 63.2, \&c., instead of 62.5, 63.5, \&c., 
is that the observations are unequally distributed between 62 and 63, 63 and 
64, \&c.,} \\
\multicolumn{18}{l}{there being a strong bias in favour of integral inches.  
After careful consideration, I concluded that the headings, as adopted, best 
satisfied the} \\
\multicolumn{18}{l}{conditions.  This inequality was not apparent in the case 
of the Mid-parents.}
\end{tabular}

\end{center}


\end{document}

%