Human-Centred Interactive Technologies Marking Form (Sample)

PRMH 20XX/X: [Fake Student]

Username:

fake100

Title:

[Title]

Qualification:

[Qualification] [Year]

Advisor:

[Fake Advisor]

Marking Deadline:

[Day], [??th Month], [20XX Midday] (Sum/X/Day)

HCIT Introduction: 10%

This should cover a meaningful title and abstract, motivation for project and clearly address the ethics of the project

Mark:

0 — 10

Remarks:

HCIT Literature review: 20%

This should give more detailed motivation, help the reader to understand the concepts in the project and to argue for research/design gap that the project addresses

Mark:

0 — 20

Remarks:

HCIT Research artefacts, designs and empirical work: 40%

This should given details of all work done to address the research or design gap including evaluation of the work done where appropriate. We do not constrain the style of studies but this would typically be one of the following:; Experiment; Interviews; Observations; UCD or other design approach; Survey; Systematic review; ; This mark should also address the issue of size of the work done here. This is a 100 credit project and, for example, an experiment of 20 people is not a lot of work unless it was a substantial experiment working with a difficult to access user group. Where research artefacts seem modest, there would need to be some discussion of the challenges of this sort of work to justify its size.

Mark:

0 — 40

Remarks:

HCIT Discussion and Conclusions: 20%

This should show how work addresses the research or design gap with suitable and useful framing in the literature and also the limitations and future work for this project.

Mark:

0 — 20

Remarks:

HCIT Presentation and formatting of work: 10%

Meets the formatting criteria of the project and is written in a readable and well presented form appropriate to the type of work done. (0 marks will be given if the report does not meet the format).

Mark:

0 — 10

Remarks:

Proposed Final Mark

Final Mark:

0 — 100

Remarks: